Real World Asset Crypto Tokens to Watch 2026 — Chainlink Dominates Infrastructure

FTC Disclosure: This article may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you click on these links and make a purchase, at no additional cost to you.

Real World Asset Crypto Tokens to Watch 2026 — Chainlink Dominates Infrastructure

Here's something most crypto investors miss: while everyone chases the next meme coin moonshot, institutional money is quietly pouring into real world asset (RWA) tokenization. The surprising truth? Traditional assets like real estate, commodities, and bonds are becoming the backbone of crypto's next major adoption wave. By 2026, we're witnessing the convergence of traditional finance and blockchain technology in ways that make previous DeFi summers look like practice rounds.

My controversial pick for the top real world asset crypto token? Chainlink (LINK). While others focus on flashy tokenized real estate platforms, Chainlink provides the critical infrastructure that makes RWA tokenization possible at scale. Without reliable price feeds and cross-chain connectivity, your tokenized Manhattan apartment or gold bars remain isolated digital curiosities.

You need to understand this fundamental shift: real world assets aren't just another crypto trend. They represent the bridge between traditional finance's stability and blockchain's efficiency. When BlackRock tokenizes treasury bills and JPMorgan moves real estate onto blockchain rails, they're not experimenting — they're building the future financial infrastructure.

Token	Primary Use Case	Market Cap Tier	Risk Level	Best For
Chainlink (LINK)	Oracle Infrastructure	Large Cap	Medium	Infrastructure Investment
Centrifuge (CFG)	Real Estate Tokenization	Mid Cap	High	Direct RWA Exposure
Maple Finance (MPL)	Institutional Lending	Small Cap	High	Yield Generation
Goldfinch (GFI)	Credit Without Collateral	Small Cap	Very High	Emerging Markets
Pendle Finance (PENDLE)	Yield Trading	Mid Cap	High	Yield Optimization

Chainlink (LINK) — Best for RWA Infrastructure Investment

Chainlink operates as the nervous system of real world asset tokenization. When you tokenize a commercial property in Tokyo or government bonds from Germany, you need accurate, tamper-proof price data. Chainlink's oracle network provides this critical infrastructure layer that connects blockchain smart contracts with real-world information.

The platform's Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) enables tokenized assets to move seamlessly between different blockchain networks. This interoperability becomes crucial when institutional investors want to trade tokenized real estate on Ethereum while settling payments on Polygon or Avalanche.

Chainlink's Proof of Reserve feeds verify that tokenized assets maintain proper backing. When you hold tokens representing gold bars in a Swiss vault, Chainlink's cryptographic proofs confirm those physical assets actually exist. This transparency builds the institutional trust necessary for large-scale RWA adoption.

The network processes price feeds for major RWA protocols including Centrifuge, Maple Finance, and traditional finance giants like SWIFT. This positioning makes Chainlink essential infrastructure rather than speculative technology. As RWA tokenization scales, Chainlink's utility and token demand grow proportionally.

Consider Chainlink your foundational RWA investment. The token benefits from broad ecosystem growth rather than dependence on single asset classes or geographic regions. This diversification provides stability while capturing upside from the entire RWA sector expansion.

Centrifuge (CFG) — Best for Direct Real Estate Tokenization

Centrifuge transforms real world assets into DeFi-compatible tokens through its Tinlake protocol. The platform focuses primarily on real estate and invoice financing, creating liquid markets for traditionally illiquid assets. Property developers can tokenize commercial buildings, enabling fractional ownership and automated rent distribution.

The protocol's asset originators undergo rigorous due diligence before listing properties or receivables. This vetting process includes legal compliance, asset valuation, and ongoing reporting requirements. Investors receive detailed documentation about underlying assets, creating transparency typically absent in traditional real estate investment trusts.

Centrifuge's governance token (CFG) enables holders to vote on protocol parameters, asset pool approvals, and treasury management. Token holders also receive rewards from protocol fees generated by successful asset pools. This creates direct exposure to platform growth and asset performance.

The platform's integration with major DeFi protocols allows tokenized real estate to serve as collateral for loans or provide liquidity in automated market makers. This composability unlocks additional yield opportunities beyond traditional rental income or asset appreciation.

Centrifuge represents pure-play exposure to real estate tokenization growth. However, this focus creates concentration risk if real estate markets face headwinds or regulatory challenges. The platform's success depends heavily on continued institutional adoption and favorable regulatory treatment of tokenized assets.

Maple Finance (MPL) — Best for Institutional Credit Markets

Maple Finance creates undercollateralized lending pools for institutional borrowers. Unlike traditional DeFi lending that requires over-collateralization, Maple enables credit-based lending similar to traditional corporate bond markets. This approach unlocks significantly larger capital pools by serving institutional borrowers with established credit histories.

The platform's pool delegates perform comprehensive due diligence on borrowers, including financial audits, legal compliance, and ongoing monitoring. These delegates stake their own capital and reputation, aligning incentives with lender protection. Borrowers include crypto market makers, trading firms, and digital asset funds.

Maple's tokenomics capture value through protocol fees on successful loans and penalties for defaults. Pool delegates receive management fees for their due diligence and monitoring services. The MPL token also provides governance rights over protocol upgrades and risk parameters.

The protocol's institutional focus creates higher barriers to entry but also reduces retail investor risks associated with unsophisticated borrowers. Loan terms typically range from 90 days to 12 months, providing predictable yield opportunities for lenders seeking alternatives to volatile DeFi farming.

Maple's institutional lending model faces regulatory uncertainty as authorities develop frameworks for crypto credit markets. The platform's success depends on maintaining borrower quality while scaling loan volumes. Credit risk remains the primary concern for token holders and protocol participants.

Goldfinch (GFI) — Best for Emerging Market Credit

Goldfinch enables crypto lending without requiring crypto collateral, focusing on real-world businesses in emerging markets. The protocol uses a unique trust-through-consensus model where community members vouch for borrowers based on real-world reputation and business fundamentals rather than digital asset holdings.

The platform's backers perform due diligence on borrowers and provide first-loss capital to protect passive lenders. This structure mirrors traditional microfinance but leverages blockchain technology for global capital access and transparent operations. Borrowers include fintech companies, agricultural businesses, and small-to-medium enterprises.

Goldfinch's governance token (GFI) enables community participation in borrower approval and protocol parameter adjustments. Token holders can also participate as backers, earning higher yields in exchange for taking first-loss positions. The protocol distributes rewards to active community members who contribute to borrower evaluation.

The platform addresses significant market opportunity in emerging economies where traditional banking infrastructure remains limited. By connecting global crypto capital with local businesses, Goldfinch creates new funding sources for underserved markets while providing crypto holders with uncorrelated yield opportunities.

Goldfinch's emerging market focus creates substantial execution risks including currency volatility, political instability, and regulatory uncertainty. The protocol's success requires building local partnerships and navigating complex international compliance requirements. Default risks remain elevated compared to developed market alternatives.

Pendle Finance (PENDLE) — Best for Yield Trading and Optimization

Pendle Finance creates markets for trading future yield from real world assets and DeFi protocols. The platform splits yield-bearing tokens into principal and yield components, enabling sophisticated strategies around interest rate expectations and yield optimization. This innovation brings traditional finance's yield curve trading to decentralized markets.

The protocol's Automated Market Maker (AMM) enables efficient price discovery for yield tokens across different time horizons. Traders can speculate on future interest rates while yield farmers can lock in current rates or amplify their exposure. This flexibility serves both conservative investors seeking predictable returns and sophisticated traders pursuing yield arbitrage.

Pendle's tokenomics capture value through trading fees and protocol-owned liquidity management. The PENDLE token provides governance rights and fee-sharing benefits. Token holders can vote on new asset integrations, fee structures, and protocol upgrades while earning rewards from platform activity.

The platform's integration with major yield-generating protocols including Aave, Compound, and Lido creates diverse trading opportunities. As real world asset tokenization scales, Pendle can facilitate yield trading for tokenized bonds, real estate income, and commodity futures. This positions the protocol at the intersection of traditional and decentralized finance.

Pendle's complex financial engineering creates barriers to mainstream adoption while appealing to sophisticated DeFi users. The protocol's success depends on continued innovation in yield-bearing assets and growing demand for yield trading strategies. Smart contract risks and integration complexities remain ongoing concerns.

Budget-Friendly RWA Token Opportunities

Not every investor can allocate significant capital to established RWA protocols. These emerging platforms offer exposure to real world asset tokenization at lower entry points, though with correspondingly higher risks.

TrueFi (TRU) — Uncollateralized Lending Pioneer

TrueFi operates one of the earliest uncollateralized lending protocols in DeFi, serving institutional borrowers through community-governed credit assessment. The platform's credit model relies on borrower reputation, financial transparency, and community oversight rather than crypto collateral requirements.

The protocol's TRU token enables community participation in borrower approval and default insurance. Token holders stake TRU to vote on loan applications and earn rewards from successful lending pools. This governance model creates direct exposure to credit performance while maintaining community control over risk parameters.

TrueFi's established track record includes successful loans to major crypto institutions and traditional finance companies. The platform's transparent reporting and conservative underwriting have maintained strong repayment rates despite challenging market conditions. This performance builds institutional confidence in decentralized credit markets.

The platform faces intensifying competition from newer protocols with more sophisticated features and better tokenomics. TrueFi's early-mover advantage diminishes as institutional borrowers gain more lending options. The protocol must continue innovating to maintain market share in evolving credit markets.

Clearpool (CPOOL) — Dynamic Interest Rate Markets

Clearpool creates permissionless credit markets where institutional borrowers can access capital through algorithmically-determined interest rates. The platform's dynamic pricing model adjusts borrowing costs based on real-time supply and demand, creating more efficient capital allocation compared to fixed-rate alternatives.

The protocol's borrower onboarding includes comprehensive due diligence and ongoing monitoring through third-party risk assessment providers. This institutional-grade compliance framework enables traditional finance companies to participate while maintaining regulatory comfort. Borrowers include market makers, trading firms, and asset managers.

Clearpool's CPOOL token captures value through protocol fees and governance participation. Token holders can vote on borrower whitelisting, risk parameters, and protocol upgrades. The tokenomics also include buyback mechanisms funded by protocol revenues, creating deflationary pressure during periods of high lending activity.

The platform's focus on dynamic pricing and algorithmic risk management differentiates it from competitor protocols using fixed-rate structures. This innovation appeals to sophisticated borrowers seeking optimal capital costs while providing lenders with market-driven yields. However, the complexity may limit mainstream adoption.

Backed Finance (BCKD) — Tokenized Securities Bridge

Backed Finance specializes in tokenizing traditional securities including stocks, bonds, and ETFs on blockchain networks. The platform creates synthetic exposure to real world assets through fully-backed tokens that track underlying asset performance. This approach enables 24/7 trading of traditional securities with blockchain settlement efficiency.

The protocol's asset backing relies on regulated custodians and market makers who maintain proper reserves for issued tokens. This structure provides transparency and regulatory compliance while enabling global access to traditional financial markets. Users can trade tokenized Apple stock or Treasury bonds without traditional brokerage limitations.

Backed's tokenomics focus on protocol fees from asset creation, trading, and management services. The BCKD token provides governance rights over asset selection, fee structures, and protocol parameters. Token holders benefit from growing adoption of tokenized securities across DeFi and traditional finance integration.

The platform operates in complex regulatory environments requiring ongoing compliance with securities laws across multiple jurisdictions. Regulatory changes could significantly impact operations or require costly adjustments. The protocol's success depends on maintaining regulatory approval while scaling tokenized asset offerings.

Risk Management for RWA Token Investment

Real world asset tokens introduce unique risks beyond typical cryptocurrency volatility. Your investment approach must account for regulatory uncertainty, asset backing verification, and traditional market correlation.

Regulatory Risk Assessment

RWA protocols operate at the intersection of traditional finance regulation and emerging crypto frameworks. Securities laws, banking regulations, and international compliance requirements create complex operating environments. Regulatory changes can immediately impact protocol operations, token valuations, and investor access.

Monitor regulatory developments in major jurisdictions including the United States, European Union, and United Kingdom. These regions often set precedents that influence global regulatory approaches. Understanding proposed legislation and regulatory guidance helps anticipate potential impacts on RWA protocol operations.

Diversify across protocols operating in different regulatory environments and asset classes. This geographic and sectoral diversification reduces concentration risk from single regulatory actions. Protocols with proactive compliance strategies and legal expertise demonstrate better preparation for regulatory evolution.

Asset Backing Verification

Tokenized real world assets require verifiable backing to maintain token value and investor confidence. Protocols must demonstrate that underlying assets exist, maintain proper custody, and accurately reflect market values. This verification becomes critical during market stress when investors question asset backing.

Evaluate protocols' asset custody arrangements, auditing procedures, and transparency reporting. Strong protocols provide regular attestations from reputable auditors, real-time asset tracking, and detailed reporting on underlying asset performance. This transparency enables informed investment decisions and risk assessment.

Consider protocols using Chainlink's Proof of Reserve or similar verification systems that provide cryptographic proof of asset backing. These automated verification systems reduce reliance on manual auditing while increasing transparency. However, verification systems must be properly implemented and regularly updated.

Traditional Market Correlation

RWA tokens often correlate with traditional asset markets more closely than pure cryptocurrency investments. Tokenized real estate follows property market cycles, while tokenized bonds reflect interest rate environments. This correlation can reduce portfolio diversification benefits during broad market downturns.

Understand how underlying asset performance affects token valuations and protocol operations. Real estate tokenization protocols face challenges during property market corrections, while credit-focused protocols encounter difficulties during economic recessions. These traditional market risks compound crypto-specific volatility.

Balance RWA token exposure with uncorrelated crypto assets to maintain portfolio diversification. Pure blockchain protocols, decentralized applications, and cryptocurrency infrastructure investments provide different risk profiles compared to asset-backed tokens. This balance helps manage overall portfolio volatility.

Platform Selection Criteria for RWA Investment

Choosing the right platforms for RWA token investment requires evaluating technical infrastructure, regulatory compliance, and market positioning. Your platform selection directly impacts investment security and growth potential.

Technical Infrastructure Evaluation

RWA protocols require robust technical infrastructure to handle asset tokenization, custody integration, and regulatory reporting. Evaluate protocols' smart contract security, audit history, and operational track record. Strong technical foundations reduce risks of exploits, operational failures, and investor losses.

Consider protocols built on established blockchain networks with proven security and scalability. Ethereum provides the most mature DeFi ecosystem but faces high transaction costs. Layer 2 solutions and alternative chains offer cost advantages but may sacrifice security or liquidity. Balance these trade-offs based on your investment strategy.

Review protocols' integration capabilities with traditional finance infrastructure including banking systems, custody providers, and regulatory reporting tools. These integrations enable seamless asset onboarding and compliance management. Protocols with strong traditional finance partnerships demonstrate institutional credibility.

Regulatory Compliance Framework

RWA protocols must navigate complex regulatory requirements across multiple jurisdictions. Evaluate protocols' legal structures, compliance procedures, and regulatory relationships. Strong compliance frameworks reduce regulatory risks while enabling institutional participation and mainstream adoption.

Consider protocols with proactive regulatory engagement including discussions with regulators, compliance officer appointments, and legal framework development. These efforts demonstrate commitment to sustainable operations within evolving regulatory environments. Protocols avoiding regulatory considerations face higher shutdown risks.

Assess protocols' geographic diversification and regulatory arbitrage strategies. Protocols operating across multiple jurisdictions can adapt to regulatory changes while maintaining operations. However, multi-jurisdictional compliance creates complexity and costs that may impact profitability and token performance.

Market Positioning and Competitive Advantages

RWA protocols compete on asset selection, user experience, and cost efficiency. Evaluate protocols' competitive positioning including unique asset classes, institutional relationships, and technological innovations. Strong market positions create sustainable competitive advantages and growth opportunities.

Consider protocols with exclusive asset access or specialized expertise in specific markets. Real estate tokenization requires property market knowledge and legal expertise, while credit protocols need underwriting capabilities and borrower networks. These specializations create barriers to entry and competitive moats.

Analyze protocols' network effects and ecosystem development. Protocols with strong developer communities, institutional partnerships, and user bases demonstrate sustainable growth potential. These network effects become self-reinforcing as more participants join the ecosystem.

Advanced RWA Investment Strategies

Sophisticated investors can implement advanced strategies to optimize RWA token returns while managing risks. These approaches require deeper market understanding but can enhance portfolio performance.

Yield Farming with RWA Tokens

Many RWA protocols offer yield farming opportunities through liquidity provision, staking, or governance participation. These programs provide additional returns beyond token appreciation while supporting protocol operations. However, yield farming introduces smart contract risks and impermanent loss potential.

Evaluate yield farming programs' sustainability and risk-adjusted returns. High yields often indicate high risks or unsustainable token emissions. Consider programs with reasonable yields backed by genuine protocol revenues rather than inflationary token rewards. This approach provides more sustainable long-term returns.

Diversify across multiple yield farming opportunities to reduce concentration risk while maintaining exposure to RWA sector growth. Balance high-yield opportunities with conservative staking programs to optimize risk-adjusted returns. Monitor program changes and exit conditions to maintain flexibility.

Cross-Chain RWA Arbitrage

RWA tokens often trade on multiple blockchain networks with price differences creating arbitrage opportunities. Cross-chain arbitrage requires technical expertise and capital efficiency but can generate consistent returns during market inefficiencies. These opportunities typically exist during high volatility or low liquidity periods.

Implement automated arbitrage strategies using cross-chain bridges and decentralized exchanges. These strategies require careful risk management including bridge security assessment, slippage calculation, and gas fee optimization. Consider using established bridges with strong security track records and insurance coverage.

Monitor cross-chain arbitrage opportunities across major RWA tokens and blockchain networks. Opportunities often emerge during network congestion, bridge maintenance, or major market events. Maintaining ready capital and technical infrastructure enables rapid opportunity capture.

RWA Index Construction

Creating diversified RWA token indices reduces individual protocol risks while maintaining sector exposure. Index strategies can follow market capitalization weighting, equal weighting, or fundamental analysis approaches. These strategies provide broad RWA exposure without requiring individual protocol analysis.

Consider constructing indices based on asset classes, geographic regions, or risk profiles. Real estate-focused indices provide property market exposure, while credit-focused indices capture lending market opportunities. This segmentation enables targeted exposure based on investment objectives and market views.

Implement regular rebalancing to maintain target allocations and capture momentum effects. Monthly or quarterly rebalancing provides sufficient adjustment frequency while minimizing transaction costs. Consider using decentralized index protocols or automated rebalancing tools to reduce manual intervention requirements.

Future Outlook for RWA Tokenization

The real world asset tokenization market continues evolving rapidly with institutional adoption, regulatory clarity, and technological advancement driving growth. Understanding these trends helps position investments for long-term success.

Institutional Adoption Acceleration

Major financial institutions increasingly explore RWA tokenization for efficiency gains, cost reduction, and new revenue opportunities. Banks, asset managers, and insurance companies pilot tokenization programs for various asset classes. This institutional adoption validates the technology while creating massive market opportunities.

BlackRock's tokenized money market funds and JPMorgan's blockchain settlement initiatives demonstrate institutional commitment to asset tokenization. These pilots often evolve into full-scale implementations, creating substantial demand for RWA infrastructure and services. Protocols serving institutional needs benefit most from this adoption wave.

Expect continued institutional investment in RWA protocols through direct token purchases, strategic partnerships, and technology integration. This institutional capital provides stability and growth funding while validating protocol business models. However, institutional involvement may reduce retail investor opportunities and influence protocol governance.

Regulatory Framework Development

Regulatory authorities worldwide develop comprehensive frameworks for asset tokenization, digital securities, and blockchain-based financial services. Clear regulations enable broader institutional participation while protecting investors and maintaining market integrity. This regulatory clarity reduces uncertainty and compliance costs.

The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation and similar frameworks in other jurisdictions provide operational guidance for RWA protocols. These regulations often require licensing, capital requirements, and operational standards that favor well-capitalized protocols over smaller competitors.

Monitor regulatory developments for investment opportunities and risks. Favorable regulations can dramatically increase protocol valuations and adoption rates. Conversely, restrictive regulations may force protocol changes, geographic relocations, or operational shutdowns. Stay informed about regulatory proposals and implementation timelines.

Technology Infrastructure Maturation

Blockchain infrastructure continues improving with better scalability, lower costs, and enhanced security. These improvements reduce barriers to RWA tokenization while enabling new use cases and market participants. Advanced features like privacy protection, automated compliance, and cross-chain interoperability expand market opportunities.

Layer 2 solutions and alternative blockchain networks provide cost-effective platforms for RWA tokenization. These platforms often offer specialized features for asset tokenization including regulatory compliance tools, identity management, and institutional custody integration. Protocol migration to advanced platforms can improve operations and reduce costs.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning integration enhances risk assessment, asset valuation, and automated compliance. These technologies enable more sophisticated RWA protocols with improved efficiency and reduced operational risks. Protocols adopting advanced technologies gain competitive advantages and institutional appeal.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes real world asset crypto tokens different from regular cryptocurrencies?

Real world asset crypto tokens represent ownership or exposure to physical assets like real estate, commodities, or traditional securities. Unlike regular cryptocurrencies that derive value from network utility or speculation, RWA tokens maintain backing from tangible assets with established market values. This backing provides stability and correlation to traditional markets while enabling blockchain-based trading and settlement.

How do I verify that RWA tokens are properly backed by real assets?

Verification requires examining protocol documentation, audit reports, and custody arrangements. Look for regular attestations from reputable auditing firms, real-time asset tracking systems, and transparent reporting on underlying asset performance. Protocols using Chainlink's Proof of Reserve or similar verification systems provide cryptographic proof of asset backing. Always review custody provider credentials and insurance coverage.

What are the main risks of investing in RWA crypto tokens?

Key risks include regulatory uncertainty, asset backing verification challenges, traditional market correlation, and smart contract vulnerabilities. Regulatory changes can immediately impact protocol operations and token valuations. Asset backing requires ongoing verification to maintain investor confidence. RWA tokens often correlate with traditional markets, reducing diversification benefits during broad market downturns.

Which blockchain networks are best for RWA token investment?

Ethereum provides the most mature ecosystem with extensive DeFi integration and institutional adoption. However, high transaction costs favor Layer 2 solutions like Polygon or Arbitrum for cost-sensitive applications. Alternative chains like Solana or Avalanche offer speed and cost advantages but may sacrifice security or liquidity. Consider your investment strategy and risk tolerance when choosing networks.

How do RWA tokens generate returns for investors?

Returns come from multiple sources including token appreciation, underlying asset performance, protocol fee sharing, and yield farming opportunities. Token prices often reflect underlying asset values plus protocol adoption and market sentiment. Many protocols distribute fees to token holders or offer staking rewards. Some platforms enable yield farming through liquidity provision or governance participation.

Can I use RWA tokens as collateral in DeFi protocols?

Many established RWA tokens serve as collateral in major DeFi lending protocols like Aave or Compound. However, collateral acceptance depends on token liquidity, price stability, and oracle support. Newer or smaller RWA tokens may lack sufficient liquidity or price feeds for collateral use. Always verify collateral acceptance and liquidation risks before borrowing against RWA tokens.

What minimum investment amount do I need for RWA token exposure?

Most RWA tokens have no minimum investment requirements beyond network transaction costs. You can purchase fractional amounts of tokens representing expensive assets like commercial real estate or fine art. However, some institutional-focused protocols may have minimum participation amounts for certain features or yield programs. Start small and increase exposure as you gain experience.

How do taxes work for RWA token investments?

Tax treatment varies by jurisdiction and asset type. RWA tokens may be subject to capital gains taxes, securities regulations, or specialized asset taxation depending on underlying assets and local laws. Tokenized real estate might face property tax implications, while tokenized securities could trigger securities tax treatment. Consult qualified tax professionals familiar with cryptocurrency and asset tokenization regulations.

What happens if an RWA protocol shuts down or fails?

Protocol failure risks depend on asset custody arrangements and legal structures. Well-designed protocols maintain asset custody through regulated third parties with clear recovery procedures. However, protocol tokens may lose value even if underlying assets remain secure. Review protocol documentation, legal structures, and emergency procedures before investing. Consider insurance coverage and recovery mechanisms.

How can I stay updated on RWA token developments and opportunities?

Follow protocol official channels, industry publications, and regulatory announcements for timely updates. Join protocol communities, attend industry conferences, and monitor institutional adoption news. Use portfolio tracking tools to monitor token performance and protocol metrics. Stay informed about regulatory developments that may impact RWA tokenization and protocol operations.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risks including total loss of capital. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consult with qualified financial advisors before making investment decisions. The author may hold positions in mentioned cryptocurrencies.